If you can't find the correct answer, keep making mistakes until you get better at it. Or just blow everything up.
Thursday, June 1, 2017
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
In general, you can't substitute an input variable into a function and expect the output of the function to be unchanged.
In general, you can't substitute an input variable into a function and expect the output of the function to be unchanged.
Even if the function equals a constant, it may depend on the input variable and its output may happen to equal a constant for all values of that particular variable - but not produce the same output for another variable.
Let v(t) = t^p / p!
Consider the function (d/dt)^p [ v(t) ] = 1
If we replace the input variable with (1-t), keeping the function itself (as a p-th derivative with respect to t) unchanged, we get
(d/dt)^p [ v(1-t) ] = { 1 if p even, -1 if p odd}
because each differentiation of v(1-t) = (1-t)^p / p! introduces a multiplicative factor of (-1)
If we take an additional derivative with respect to t, as in the case of (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(t) ], we get a function that is zero for all values of (1-t). The function happens to be equal to its cousin (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t) ] = 0, only because (d/dt)^p [ v(t) ] and (d/dt)^p [ v(1-t) ] are both constants.
It would be incorrect and misleading to assert that because (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(t) ] = 0, therefore (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t) ] = 0. Even if the function equals zero everywhere, we cannot simply substitute one input variable with another.
For example, if we had tried (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t^2) ], the function is not identically zero. It is a parabolic curve with squiggles crossing the x-axis between -1<t<1, as the graph for p=8 shows below.
Even if the function equals a constant, it may depend on the input variable and its output may happen to equal a constant for all values of that particular variable - but not produce the same output for another variable.
Let v(t) = t^p / p!
Consider the function (d/dt)^p [ v(t) ] = 1
If we replace the input variable with (1-t), keeping the function itself (as a p-th derivative with respect to t) unchanged, we get
(d/dt)^p [ v(1-t) ] = { 1 if p even, -1 if p odd}
because each differentiation of v(1-t) = (1-t)^p / p! introduces a multiplicative factor of (-1)
If we take an additional derivative with respect to t, as in the case of (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(t) ], we get a function that is zero for all values of (1-t). The function happens to be equal to its cousin (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t) ] = 0, only because (d/dt)^p [ v(t) ] and (d/dt)^p [ v(1-t) ] are both constants.
It would be incorrect and misleading to assert that because (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(t) ] = 0, therefore (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t) ] = 0. Even if the function equals zero everywhere, we cannot simply substitute one input variable with another.
For example, if we had tried (d/dt)^(p+1) [ v(1-t^2) ], the function is not identically zero. It is a parabolic curve with squiggles crossing the x-axis between -1<t<1, as the graph for p=8 shows below.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

